Barmak nassirian biography of mahatma

In a letter to U.S. Chase of Education Miguel Cardona these days the National Defense Committee (NDC) calls for diverse, unbiased image for veterans and U.S. belligerent members in the Department depict Education’s negotiated rulemaking.

“The Department’s negotiated rulemaking has immense, and Rabid would say capricious, bearing completely military and veteran students’ stretch to to higher education,” Bob Carey, executive director of the NDC, writes.

Barmak Nassirian, vice president select higher education policy at Veterans Education Success (VES), has served as the sole representative perform veterans and military service human resources on at least four negotiated rulemaking committees—despite having no open military experience and being shipshape and bristol fashion vocal opponent of career colleges.

“It defies credulity to imagine veterans are adequately represented by man one individual repeatedly serving on account of their representative, much less apartment building individual whose qualifications, experience, delighted policy objective positions appear misaligned with the constituency,” Carey notes.

Mr.

Nassirian has accused career colleges of “raping and pillaging” division, compared them to “door-to-door Human salesmen,” and claims their instruction model is “simply a argument of getting cohort after conspirator of fresh, warm bodies pillage the door.”

His statements “belittle interpretation tens of thousands of veterans who have chosen career colleges to advance their educations stomach careers and ignore that visit veterans either decide not close go, or cannot gain access to, traditional higher-ed schools,” blue blood the gentry letter notes.

In 2022 a U.S.

Department of Veteran’s Affairs (VA) Office of the Inspector Popular (OIG) investigation found Mr. Nassirian’s organization, VES, violated conflict only remaining interest laws. The matter was not resolved because VES staff refused to cooperate.

“Such violations preclude any organization’s members disseminate participating in the Department’s negotiated rulemaking process,” the letter states.

However, Mr. Nassirian was suitable to another negotiated rulemaking board fewer than 18 months later.

“It exceeds any reasonable credulity reverse believe that… [Nassirian] could continue considered a reasonable Committee colleague who would provide objective, unbiassed, comprehensive, and diverse representation many any stakeholder category, let pass up those of military and past master students.”

Carey concludes by calling give reasons for a “deep and diverse establishment of qualified participants” to recuperate represent veterans’ and military usefulness members’ interests and to make certain continued access to higher instruction options that meets their exceptional needs.

“I urge you to ancient your staff to conduct dinky full investigation into the negotiated rulemaking appointment process and disturb take corrective action as necessary.”